/bin/pwd versus built-in pwd

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Sat Jan 27 07:47:00 GMT 2001


On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:09:06PM +0200, Ehud Karni wrote:
>>On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:56:23 -0800, Bob McGowan <rmcgowan@veritas.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  "...That is, all components of the printed name will be actual
>>>   directory names -- none will be symbolic links."
>>> 
>>> I'd say this is a bug.
>>
>>Despite what Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> thinks, I'll say it
>>is a real bug with critical implications.
>
>Huh?  I never said it wasn't a bug.  Quite the contrary.
>
>I suggested that people read the email archives.  Look for "pwd symlink".

I've checked in a fix for this.  It will be in cygwin 1.1.8.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



More information about the Cygwin mailing list