Text editors under Cygnus
Glen Coakley
gcoakley@mqsoftware.com
Mon Jul 23 12:07:00 GMT 2001
> Glen Coakley wrote:
>
> > If you would like a lighter version (no X code):
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ntemacs.html
> > ( http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html )
> >
> > It doesn't run 'under' Cygnus but it does run on Windows
> and the FAQ lists
> > where to get a small lisp module that will teach it to
> understand Cygwin
> > mounts and paths.
>
>
> I don't want to get into a "my-emacs-is-better" flamewar --
> both NTEmacs
> and XEmacs are great packages. However, I do want to clear up a
> misunderstanding:
>
> Despite the name "XEmacs", the packages built for windows and
> for cygwin
> do NOT require an Xserver. In fact, they don't contain the X code at
> all. (You *can* build an X-based XEmacs for cygwin, but the official
> package is not built that way).
>
> --Chuck
Thanks for correcting that. I made an assumption about what caused XEmacs to
load on my system. The 'lighter version' comments stands. XEmacs (OOTB)
loads much slower then Emacs. I will stop guessing as to why.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list