Cygwin: Interoperability Is Important (was Cygwin: Open or Closed System, etc)
Ronald W. Cook
rwc@cowaro.com
Wed Jun 27 07:44:00 GMT 2001
Dear Mr. Hamster,
I, for one, do not wish to preserve or further the use of the backslash as
you intend - by extending or enhancing its use in cygwin to acommodate
M$ applications even, if it means going out of one's way to prevent it.
I for one do not wish to preserve of further the use of the English system.
We will have to go out of our way to correct this - laissez faire costs too much.
I for one do not wish to preserve the use of MM/DD/YYYY or DD/MM/YYYY
which some don't understand when the obvious logical choice should be
YYYY/MM/DD, which EVERYONE understands.
We will have to go out of our way to correct this - laissez faire costs too much.
I for one do not wish to count my money backwards in starting a new
"just to be different" thread. That would scare me if communication failed.
I for one do not wish to start saying time MM:SS:HH in starting a new
thread. No one would understand.
There is a reason to seek order - it improves communication and can prevent
$300,000,000 mistakes (and lives?) as was not too latey demonstrated.
We will have to go out of our way to correct this - laissez faire costs too much.
Chaos or order? Some will gravitate toward one.
Thanks to the Cygwinners.
Ron Cook
www.cowaro.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list