Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?

[Andreas Eibach]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
To: "Andreas Eibach" <a.eibach@gmx.net>; <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?


> At 01:05 PM 5/1/2001, Andreas Eibach wrote:
> >I suggest to either include a _non-X_ version or omit it because "the way
it
> >comes", it's unusable for people who don't have X.
> >
> >Andreas
>
>
>
> I believe this issue has been discussed.

You are right, Larry, and I know it has been discussed. But I couldn't make
out any agreement towards a definite direction from these thread(s) yet, so
I chose to keep this topic from being forgotten.

>  I believe the direction is to include a non-X version.

I hope they will.

Andreas


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple