cygwin vfork

[Charles Wilson]

Seen on the XEmacs list:

 > In general the cygwin build is slower, I think this is for 3 main
 > reasons:
 >
 > 1) gcc optimization is not as good as MSVC
 > 2) The cygwin portability layer adds a lot of overhead especially
 > wrt file handling.
 > 3) The cygwin implementation of fork-and-exec doesn't jive well with
 > the VM size of xemacs. Supposedly a real vfork is in the works for
 > cygwin but I can't attest to its functionality.

Does #3 make any sense?  I thought we *had* a real vfork...perhaps it 
doesn't work well with large apps?  Or is the author just blowing smoke?

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/