no more package moratorium?

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Robert Collins <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au> writes:

> I think the process for that part should be something like
> 
> sponsor (for new maintainers) or maintainer (2nd package or new
> version
> of existing) places the packages files at a URL.
> They tell someone from <list of maintainers with write access>.
> <someone> uploads to cygwin.com.
> 
> If there is _any_ doubt about the package quality, upload it as
> experimental. Wait 3 weeks, and if there are no bugs reported, then
> edit
> setup.hint to make that new versiom current.
> 
> Thoughts on this?

What about existing packages?  Specifically, it would be grand if
tetex-beta would either get fixed or removed.

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/