[ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils

[Charles Wilson]

Horak Daniel wrote:

>>
>>1)  postgresql folks: does this work for you?
>>
> 
> PostgreSQL has a check for existence of union semun and can live without
> system-wide union semun.
 

Okay, but that brings us back to the thing that I don't understand: if 
there is no system-wide union semun, then application code MUST define 
it exactly the way the underlying library wants (which says to me, it 
ought to BE in the library's header...)

What does postgresql do if there is no system-wide union semun?

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/