Possible (new) sscanf bug

[Charles Wilson]

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I've forwarded this to the newlib mailing list.
> 
> sscanf is not in cygwin's domain.  It's maintained by another group.
> 


Yeah, I know.  I just figured the cygwin list should be aware of this 
*possible* bug given the current 1.3.3 work.  You are correct -- newlib 
is the correct list.  I probably should have cross-posted to both, and 
asked that replies be directed to newlib only.  Oh well.

--Chuck








--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/