ip.h & tcp.h

Wu Yongwei adah@netstd.com
Fri Apr 5 00:35:00 GMT 2002


Um, no one willing to answer?

OK, I am changing my request now. CAN CYGWIN DROP IP.H AND TCP.H IN
DISTRIBUTION FOR NOW?

Reasons:

1. They are empty and so they do not help. They may even frustrate users
because it is more difficult to find the cause from a lot of parse errors
than a simple "cannot find xxx.h" or so.

2. They harms. I have put new ip.h and tcp.h under /usr/include/netinet to
ease compilation of *NIX code. But they will be overwritten sometimes by
updating my Cygwin installation.

Best regards,

Wu Yongwei

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wu Yongwei" <adah@netstd.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:59 AM
Subject: ip.h & tcp.h


> I noticed that these two header files in /usr/include/netinet is really
> missing. I have been using the ones from FreeBSD and that fit very well. I
> just need to add the following lines to the beginning of ip.h:
>
> /* Added by Wu Yongwei */
> #ifndef LITTLE_ENDIAN
> #define LITTLE_ENDIAN   1234
> #define BIG_ENDIAN      4321
> #endif
> #ifndef BYTE_ORDER
> #define BYTE_ORDER      LITTLE_ENDIAN
> #endif
>
> Could Cygwin just use the modified FreeBSD files, or are there any other
> considerations? I don't think there are any licence issues -- it only asks
> for an acknowledgement in ads. (BTW, udp.h is good, too.)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wu Yongwei


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list