rebase and ME

Jason Tishler jason@tishler.net
Thu Aug 1 06:46:00 GMT 2002


Nicholas,

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:33:45AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 23:43, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > Then it appears that Rebase will never be part of setup until this
> > issue is solved.  
> 
> Why? Detection of ME is not-that-hard.

Bummers.  I guess that it's too late to reply with the following:

    Good.  Now I don't have to feel lame about taking forever and then
    some to add rebase to setup.exe.

:,)

Instead, I will respond with the following:

    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-08/msg00003.html

> My first comment to Jason about rebasing was that we should implement it
> via libbfd. I think the whole ME thing demonstrates that quite nicely.

If you figure out how to use libbfd to perform rebasing, then I would be
quite willing to rework my low-level rebase routines to use this instead
of ReBaseImage().

Thanks,
Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list