new vs malloc, was BUG - Cygwin to GNU CC compatibility
Ross Smith
rosss@pharos.co.nz
Tue Aug 6 19:32:00 GMT 2002
> From: Samuel [mailto:samuel@socal.rr.com]
>
> From: "Ross Smith" <rosss@pharos.co.nz>
> >
> > No user code should ever use "delete"; it should only appear in the
> > implementation of a container or smart pointer.
>
> What? I must misunderstand what is meant, since user code
> must always use
> "delete" for each "new", unless the documentation of a
> function clearly
> states that it is the function's responsibility to "delete".
This is what smart pointers (std::auto_ptr, boost::shared_ptr, etc) are
for. Anything allocated by new should always be held by a smart pointer
that will handle deletion automatically, never a raw pointer.
--
Ross Smith ...................... Pharos Systems, Auckland, New Zealand
"C++ is to programming as sex is to reproduction. Better ways might
technically exist but they're not nearly as much fun." - Nikolai Irgens
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list