CSS in the User's Guide (was:Updating dll info...)
Michael Schaap
cygwin@mscha.org
Thu Aug 22 19:21:00 GMT 2002
On 22-8-2002 21:24, Soren A wrote:
>
> I've seen no evidence that either you or Chris have taken the time to
> view the source of one of the UG pages. What I have been talking about
> all along is that DocBook is *already using CSS* in the output that is
> the UG pages. The effort required to have discovered a fragment of a
> page chosen at random, like this one (using.html#USING-PATHNAMES):
>
> By default, the POSIX root <TT CLASS="FILENAME">/</TT> points to
> the system partition but it can be relocated to any directory in
> the Windows file system using the <B CLASS="COMMAND">mount</B>
> command.
>
> seems really minimal. I have no idea why the people I am responding to
> found it beyond them (`grep -i 'CLASS='' ???) . Only complete
> unfamiliarity with HTML -- and I grant that this is a possibility, I
> realize that not all C/C++ programmers are Web page builders -- would
> leave one unable to quickly recognize that in that fragment there are
> TWO references to Cascading Style Sheets:
>
> <TT CLASS="FILENAME">
> <B CLASS="COMMAND">
>
> Yet these documents have no definition of what "COMMAND" or "FILENAME"
> should mean to the browser being asked to render the page. Half of the
> mechanism of CSS is *already* present in the documents, the other half
> is *missing*.
May I recommend that you read:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.5.2
*carefully*?
Please tell us where it insists that you must have CSS style rules
whenever you use the 'class' attribute.
>
> Lastly, my final suggestion:
> (3) Don't emulate Chris Faylor in terms of taking verbal stances or
> attitudes.
Now if this isn't the pot calling the kettle black ...
- Michael
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list