AW: gcc3.2 vs gcc2.95 - devolution never stops

[Boris Schaeling]

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com [ mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com]Im Auftrag
> von Hans Horn
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2002 00:18
> An: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Betreff: gcc3.2 vs gcc2.95 - devolution never stops
>
>
> [...]
> none of my code compiles any more (due to missing
> ostream::form(), R.I.P.).
>
> reverting back to the "old" compiler (using gcc-2 instead of
> gcc), however,
> doesn't link because refs to ostream::endl, ostream::operator<<, and such
> are undefined.
>
> Please tell me that I am doing something terribly stupid!

ostream::form() is a non-standard method.

Boris


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/