Bug in Cygwin SSHD on windows XP
Tino Lange
tino.lange@isg.de
Wed Dec 18 07:52:00 GMT 2002
Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> Because vague bug reports are all we have. And no-one can
>>> reproduce it either.
Frank-Michael Moser <moser@decodon.com> wrote:
>> [http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01745.html]
>> When you investigat that thread you do not find only "vague bug
>> reports".
Max Bowsher wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't remember that thread. You did indeed provide pretty much
> all the debug information it is possible to provide.
> It's a shame that this problem is so elusive.
----------
Hi!
I also want to remind you on that thread
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-11/msg00881.html
started by me in November about the same topic.
After zoning out a bit about "cygcheck.out" I think I finally also
provided all needed information. I get errorcode 0 by the way, not 126.
Unfortunately the problem still exists on my Win2000-Box.
Best regards
Tino
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list