Close to libiconv now?

[Charles Wilson]

I've rebuilt it using the latest (cygwin-devel) libtool.  It seems fine 
-- passes all the tests.  It's packaged using "my" script mechanism, and 
only needs some Cygwin-specific documentation and prefix changed from 
/usr/local to /usr and it would be ready for inclusion in cygwin.

HOWEVER

I cannot support additional packages at this time(*).  I'm perfectly 
willing to hand the completed package over to someone else for 
maintainance -- as long as I can wash my hands of it.  I built it as a 
test of libtool -- but I do NOT want to support it.

Any volunteers?

--Chuck

(*) okay, *one* more -- pkgconfig -- is in the works.  but that's it.  I 
mean it. ;-)

Soren Andersen wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> With the newest autotools in the official Cygwin packages, are we now
> close to being able to build gnu libiconv o-o-b?
> 
> I am trying to build gcc-3.0.3 and it suggests that i might want to
> install libiconv. I understand from reading list archives that Chuck
> Wilson built an experimental libiconv using some hacked autotools
> support, last july. Any updates on that topic?
> 
>  Regards,
>     Soren Andersen
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/