rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing
Robert Collins
robert.collins@itdomain.com.au
Thu Jan 3 05:27:00 GMT 2002
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Tishler" <jason@tishler.net>
> > IMO we should be using bfd not the MS helper libraries - in the long
> > term. Otherwise one cannot do any of this as part of a cross compile
or
> > cross-manipulation toolkit.
>
> Good point.
>
> I'm willing to do the right thing, but that is going to take longer
given
> the ramp up necessary for me learn about binutils' configury/make,
bfd,
> etc. However, I would like to get a rebase solution into setup.exe
ASAP.
> Is a two prong approach acceptable? In the short term, add rebase to
> winsup/utils, integrate directly into setup.exe, etc. In the long
term,
> add rebase to binutils, integrate with ld, etc.
Yes. In fact it's probably a requirement, as setup.exe cannot get too
big.
Does the MS solution need .dll's not present on win95a ?
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list