run batch w/o .bat?
Barnhart, Kevin
Kevin.Barnhart@echostar.com
Tue Jun 4 11:49:00 GMT 2002
[Barnhart, Kevin] As I understand it, the only alternative right
now is to place #! at the beginning of each of my batch files. You
mentioned that having the shell program sort through for .bat in addition to
other extensions would be a performance issue. I was just commenting that
this alternative would probably be worse than the fraction of a second that
the shell would have to take to look at some additional files. I'm probably
more of a special case, though (which is why this would be a nice option).
>> >> Performance issues = me having to edit new batch files
all the time.
>> OK but I really have no idea what this statement means in the
context of
> this thread.
>
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list