New snapshot with significant new functionality
fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net
fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net
Wed May 1 23:16:00 GMT 2002
No problems, but is all the following expected behaviour? Having
uncompressed the new .dll and copied it to /bin:
1. had to make /proc using mkdir /proc
2. ls -al / doesn't actually show /proc
3. ls -al /proc shows (something like)
dr-xr-xr-x 10 0 medicine 0 Jan 1 1970 1951627
dr-xr-xr-x 10 0 medicine 0 Jan 1 1970 2022611
dr-xr-xr-x 7 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 registry
-r--r--r-- 1 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 uptime
-r--r--r-- 1 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 version
4. Note lack of . and ..
5. ls -al /proc/1951627 shows a lot of stuff, but
6. ls -al /proc/2022611 gives
ls: /proc/2022611: No such file or directory
If this is all what /should/ happen then that's fine (and please excuse
naive questioning).
Fergus
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list