1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2.

[Max Bowsher]

Jens Yllman <jens@yllman.com> wrote:

> But isn't that just this implementation. Should I realy take for
> granted that they always are defines? When compiling without -O2 they
> seem to be functions.

So? Dropping your unnecessary :: is not "taking for granted that they always
are defines".

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/