binutils 20021107-2

[Charles Wilson]

Charles Wilson wrote:


>>> Oops.  Previous patch still left a chunk of Egor's changes.  New 
>>> patch replaces.
>>>
>>
>> How about submitting the patch to the binutils mailing list?
>>
> 
> 
> I've no objections -- but the patch is a workaround for a 
> cygwin-specific packaging decision (e.g. providing gcc-2.95.3 as "gcc-2" 
> and renaming the runtime libs accordingly).
> 
> Is that something that should go into the "real" binutils CVS, or should 
> it be kept in the cygwin binutils package only?

Another alternative -- slightly more general (don't include the "." 
char, and take advantage of the fact that we only check the first N 
characters of the name).

--Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ld_patch_for_gcc2.diff
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20021109/0bc6568a/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/