ls problem

Randall R Schulz rrschulz@cris.com
Tue Nov 19 08:11:00 GMT 2002


Carlo,

I think your next step must be to run "ls" under "strace" and see where the 
excess time (presumably idle time) is going.

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 17:00 2002-11-19, Carlo Florendo wrote:
>Hi Igor,
>
>I tried disabling ntsec and "ls -l" is still slow.  I'm using 
>1.3.15-cygwin-1-3-15-1.  "ls -l" and "ls -ln" takes almost the same amount 
>of time.    On a directory with 3 short text files, the difference, when I 
>timed "ls -l" and "ls -b", is still considerable.
>
>fcarlo@ZEUS~
>$ time ls -b
>a  b  test
>
>real    0m0.024s
>user    0m0.030s
>sys     0m0.015s
>
>fcarlo@ZEUS ~
>$ time ls -l
>total 11
>-rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None            5 Nov 19 13:58 a
>-rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None            5 Nov 19 13:58 b
>-rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None         8283 Nov 19 13:59 test
>
>real    0m1.819s
>user    0m0.030s
>sys     0m0.000s
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Carlo Florendo


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list