cygwin's autoconf?

[Lapo Luchini]

>
>
>I believe that autoreconf isn't entirely reliable.
>
>This is the reason that projects (e.g. libgetopt++) often have a
>bootstrap.sh which runs the relevant autotools.
>
Doing "aclocal && automake && autoconf" as the autobook suggests doesn't 
change things... =(
(or: it does seldom work, but usually doesn't.. that's why I'm thinking 
about granularity in NT's timekeeping)

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/