paths like //usr/local
cygwin@cygwin.com
cygwin@cygwin.com
Tue Oct 15 11:45:00 GMT 2002
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:09:50PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote:
>hi,
>
>a path like //usr/local is treated as an UNC path.
>this might leads to problems when an application is using //usr/local as
>a normal "unix"-path.
>
>i don't know how to overcome the problem, but one might think of a path
>like /unc/computer/share instead of using the path //computer/share
>
>what was the idea behind the current behaviour?
Do you think that Microsoft employees read this mailing list? I'm sure
that there are one or two but I doubt that they could speak definitively
about why Microsoft chose this behavior.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list