Problem in executable file mechanism

Igor Pechtchanski pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
Wed Apr 16 18:17:00 GMT 2003


On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:56:32AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > Try "strace sh -c ls".
> >       Igor
>
> Well... let's get serious.  What do you expect?  Think UNIX.  The
> executable is 'ls'.  The directory is 'ls'.  This is only possible
> on Windows because the executables have this .exe suffix.  On UNIX
> this won't be a problem since there wouldn't be two files with the
> same name in a directory.
>
> Corinna

Yes.  But since such a mechanism *was* introduced in Cygwin, shouldn't the
executable take precedence, at least for an exec() call?  I can't think of
a situation when anyone would want to exec() a directory...
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
  -- Leto II


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list