Controversial what if.... we disable ntsec by default again?

[Doug VanLeuven]

Christopher Faylor wrote:

>On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:46:05AM -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote:
>  
>
>>Why isn't ntsec a mount option?
>>    
>>
>
>The standard reason.
>  
>

Which is the standard reason?
1. It's that way because nobody has coded it yet.
2. It's that way because the core team analyzed it and believe it is 
best done the way it is.

-- 
Doug VanLeuven : 707-545-6945 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax)
Programmer/Analyst, SCWA : doug@scwa.ca.gov
Chief Engineer, USMM : roamdad@attglobal.net



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/