du.exe v3.5/4.1 or v3.16/4.0: where is the bug?
Gerrit P. Haase
gp@familiehaase.de
Mon Aug 18 21:25:00 GMT 2003
Hallo Elisabetta,
Am Montag, 18. August 2003 um 17:16 schriebst du:
> Hello.
> My problem is about different versions of du.exe that work in a different
> way.
> Details:
> the argument is executing du against a file owned by a different user than
> the one running du.
> first case:
> du <file>
> <disk usage> <file>
> du --version
> GNU fileutils 3.5
> GNU fileutils 4.1
> second case:
> du <file>
> <file>: Permission denied
> du --version
> GNU fileutils 3.16
> GNU fileutils 4.0
> In other words, using version 3.16 or 4.0 du fails to execute due to
> restricted permissions on the file.
What kind of permission makes the 3.16/4.0 versions fail?
> What I wonder is why the behaviour changed through all those du.exe
> versions and finally what should be the right way of working.
Maybe an old 3.16 bug was 'reintroduced by accident' with 4.0?
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list