Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'
Randall R Schulz
rrschulz@cris.com
Sun Feb 2 21:31:00 GMT 2003
Max,
At 13:12 2003-02-02, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> >> Perhaps ... but I'm not running under bash and never have. Did I
> >> miss a documented restriction that the programs *only* run under
> >> bash?
> >
> > It depends on the package. With something like grep you cannot (?)
> > call a egrep from cmd.exe/command.com per se as it is a symbolic link
> > to grep.exe (a windows shortcut) but you could call it from bash
>
>Ah, but since it is created by setup, it is a system-cookie type symlink,
>not a windows-shortcut type symlink.
On my system both egrep and fgrep are old-style Cygwin-only symlinks.
But some of the symlinks in my Cygwin bin directory are the new Windows
shortcut-based symlinks.
Perhaps this mixture occurs for me because my Cygwin installation
predates the debut of the Windows-shortcut-based symlinks. Or could it
be because some of the symlinks are created by post-install scripts and
are new-style and others are created by the tar code embedded in the
Cygwin Setup.exe installer and are the old kind?
> >> bash -c /bin/egrep
> >
> > within your batch scripts.
>
>What about grep -E ? (Which is preferred anyway for maximum portability.)
(Oh?)
>Max.
Randall Schulz
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list