FW: Sed Script works in 3.02-1, fails in 4.0.1-1

Randall R Schulz rrschulz@cris.com
Mon Jan 13 03:30:00 GMT 2003


Dwight,

I can reproduce your problem using sed 4.0.1, assuming sed actually gets 
some input (if there's no input on standard input, the diagnostic does not 
occur). Changing the pattern separators does not cure the problem. 
Replicating the address range pattern ("<.BLOCKQUOTE>") in the empty 
substitute target pattern does not help.

I'm not a total SED junkie, so maybe there's something I'm overlooking 
here, but it does appear to me to be a bug.

Randall Schulz


At 07:41 2003-01-10, Dwight Neal wrote:

>I included the WRONG sed script with the original message.
>
>Attached is the correct one--that is, the one that creates the fuss--, 
>with the (obviously) missing RE.
>
>Sorry to waste your time on that--I had been doing a lot of testing and 
>forgot I fiddled with the script.
>
>Thanks,
>Dwight Neal



More information about the Cygwin mailing list