Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

[Max Bowsher]

Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
> ===
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu>
>
>
>>> I still suspect we need a <= rather than == - but we'll see :}.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> Only if "files" is traversed in order of decreasing minlevel.
>> Otherwise we'd have to traverse the whole set before we can find the
>> right log file. Either way, a simple "<=" won't do it, IMO...
>
> Yes but :].
>
> My point is that given the following:
> a level 1 and a level 2 log file, should logfile name(3) fail, or find
> 1/2 ?

I would have thought fail. I can see an argument for wanting logfile(2) to
find a level 3 log file if no level 2 exists, though.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/