cygwin gcc 3.4 and cygwin
Brian Ford
ford@vss.fsi.com
Wed Mar 12 22:00:00 GMT 2003
Brian Ford wrote:
>Cygwin's gcc has an extensive number of patches and is pre 3.2. There
>must be a reason for this. Maybe it is just volunteer time, but somehow
>I doubt it.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>There is no hidden agenda here.
>
Ok. But is it "kosher" for me to submit and revise patches to vanilla gcc
that I did not write, ie. those that are already part of Cygwin's gcc?
>If you want to improve the trunk version of gcc, feel free to submit
>patches to the appropriate mailing list. You do have an assignment on
>file with the FSF, right?
>
So far, all of my patches to FSF software have been classified as
"trivial" or were before the strict assignment campaign. This is
obviously easily fixable by me when necessary, though.
--
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax: 314-551-8444
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list