cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

[Brian Ford]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:

> I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the
> new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to
> separately select gcc-c++.
>
> I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug,
> since you always face this kind of problem when you split up a
> monolithic package into separate smaller ones. Which one(s) do you
> classifiy as the default successor(s)?
>
Logically, I'd say all that were in the previous monolithic package, and
none that were not.  That's easy.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/