cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?
Brian Ford
ford@vss.fsi.com
Thu Nov 13 22:26:00 GMT 2003
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote:
> > However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> > to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> > bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.
>
> What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think setup would do
> version specific dependencies for the *old version* ?
>
I didn't create the hint, the gcc maintainer did. I was just describing
how it should work for minmal user confusion.
> Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
> version*.
>
I didn't think version specific dependencies would be needed here. I'm
obviously not well versed in setup, but I thought that replacing the old
monolithic gcc package with an empty one and ajdusting that empty one's
dependencies to require the new equivalent packages would have done the
trick. I guess I was wrong here?
--
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax: 314-551-8444
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list