patchutils 0.2.30-1

[Max Bowsher]

Daniel Jensen wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why patchutils 0.2.30-1 is marked as
> experimental?

It's not. It's actually erroneously marked as prev, due to me not realizing 
how upset would order the version numbers without assistance.

Fixed now.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/