{FAQ, UG} alert? rebase

[Larry Hall]

At 09:38 PM 2/22/2004, Thomas L Roche you wrote:
>Given recent traffic concerning the goodness of rebase'ing, e.g.
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01097.html
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00899.html
>
>(but occasional breakage, e.g.
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01100.html
>
>) perhaps some treatment of the topic is FAQ- or UG-worthy?


I think we can categorize the current problem as a bug.  There has been 
some good effort to track down the problem, though there's at least
still some discussion that needs to occur before we can say the problem 
is resolved.  Given that this is likely a bug, it doesn't make much sense
to document it formally in the FAQ or UG.  If it becomes a limitation 
for some reason, then the UG is likely to be the best place for added 
documentation, unless the problem actually becomes a FAQ.



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/