Unix pipes implemented successfully

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:57:29PM +0200, linamat@moldtelecom.md wrote:
>>Sorry, but no.  The CVS version of cygwin already has a stub of a fifo
>>implementation and the device/fhandler stuff is much different than
>>1.5.5.
>
>But if I change the patch to be compliant with last CVS, should you change
>the answer?

Sorry but it's unlikely.  As I said, there is already a start of an
implementation for this which I am unlikely to want to throw out.

I expect to have a working fifo implementation in a couple of releases.
It's the next thing I'll work on after fixing the signal/thread problems
in the current CVS.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/