Extending long threads
Rolf Campbell
Endlisnis@mailc.net
Sat Jul 10 23:32:00 GMT 2004
GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
> There's three reasons people knee-jerk against HTML email:
>
> 1. It isn't ASCII (i.e. the "Back in my day a child would open up a gift
> and within seconds he'd either burst into flames or lose a limb! That's the
> way it was and we liked it!"[1] Defense).
> 2a. There isn't an email program alive which can do a "Reply" to an HTML
> email properly.
I'm using one right now...
Mozilla (Thunderbird) handles replying to HTML email just fine.
> 2b. ...especially those which support VT-100 terminals.
> 3. The lines are longer than 80 characters ;-).
>
> I fall under category 2a, but my knee isn't jerking: If Outlook didn't
> absolutely s*ck *ss at "editing" HTML I wouldn't care.
You can't blame everything on your choice to use Outlook.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list