Snapshot 20040225: make hangs/errors out

Rolf Campbell Endlisnis@mailc.net
Tue Mar 2 22:58:00 GMT 2004


Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:27:33PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote:
> 
>>>I can reproduce with that snapshot, but I get slightly different
>>>results.  Here is the stderr output from 1052 runs, but the strange
>>>thing is that even when I get errors, the task continues to run.  It
>>>seems somehow that the return code of the errored run gets lost or
>>>something.
>>
>>Are you still using this script:
>>
>>export C=1 while strace -o strace.$C.txt make -j ; do C=$(($C+1)) ;
>>done echo Failed after $C runs
>>
>>If yes: The strace catches the errors.  I use a script without strace
>>and the while catches the error of the make command.
> 
> 
> Do you actually have an strace which demonstrates the problem?  I
> don't any indication that you've duplicated this problem running
> strace with a "modern" snapshot.

I have reproduced the problem with a recent snapshot ('25), and strace, 
but I am only using a single strace output file, so it keeps going and 
over-writes the errored strace with the next run.  I will run it tonight 
while preserving all strace logs, but I can only run for about 1500 
iterations before I fill my disk.  I hope it happens before that.

Is there any way to tell strace to mimic the return code of it's 
inferior process?

-Rolf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list