[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: clamav-0.80-2

[Reini Urban]

Morche Matthias schrieb:
> Is the expected behaviour of clamscan to avoid scanning the root directory as shown below?
> 
> $ clamscan -v -r /

Certainly not. Thanks for the report! Clearly a clamscan bug.
(Still < 1.0)

$ clamscan -v //
///.bash_history: Access denied.
Scanning ///.rnd
///.rnd: OK
Scanning ///curl-la.patch

So clamscan wrongly adds another / to the front.
(three is okay, two is a network path)
Will be fixed ASAP.

My latest huge autotool patch got no response from Thomas so far, so it 
could need some time to be fixed upstream also.

> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
> Known viruses: 25864
> Scanned directories: 1
> Scanned files: 0
> Infected files: 0
> Data scanned: 0.00 MB
> I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes
> Time: 0.940 sec (0 m 0 s)
> 
> 
> 
> A "clamscan -r /*" does a scan through at least some subdirectories!

-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/