Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.
Tim Prince
tprince@computer.org
Sat Oct 30 18:44:00 GMT 2004
At 07:55 AM 10/29/2004, Ole Jacob Hagen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the
>performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3.
>
>The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it with
>gcc-3.2.x instead.
>
>The reason might be that the memory allocator on gnu stdc++ has changed to
>one which is several times slower,
>and therefore gives horrible performance on gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4.
>
>Therefore it would be nice to have gcc-3.2.2-3 to my cygwin.
>
>So where can I find gcc-3.2.2-3 to my cygwin?
If you haven't built and tested the gcc of your choice on cygwin, how do
you know it performs better? What does the -3 mean in this context? Maybe
you're comparing performance between different platforms, or at least
different gcc targets.
Tim Prince
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list