Losing track of processes?
Brian Dessent
brian@dessent.net
Thu Apr 14 22:12:00 GMT 2005
"Shaffer, Kenneth" wrote:
> > If you're not using the -17 (test) version of bash, try that.
>
> Wow! Much better! My scripts are still churning after 4 hours. When will
> this be part of an offical cygwin drop?
Well, it's already "official" in that it's been on all the cygwin
mirrors for quite some time. But it's marked as a test version so you
don't get it by default. I think the initial reason was that it
contained patches that had not been fully tested yet and with a package
like bash you don't want to release untested code until you're sure it's
stable.
However, that was in November, so it's been a good 5 months or so in
that state. Another issue here is that the current bash maintainer is
very busy and has limited access to a Windows machine. There has been
talk of another person volunteering to step in and get version 3
packaged and released, but so far nothing has come of it.
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list