status of bash-3.0-12
Eric Blake
ebb9@byu.net
Thu Dec 15 13:12:00 GMT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes on 12/15/2005 1:43 AM:
>>My plan for bash-3.0-12 and beyond is to only upgrade /bin/sh to the
>>newest bash version if /bin/sh has an older timestamp than /bin/bash,
>>and is not ksh or zsh.
>
> I see about a week after the above, you put out an experimental
> bash-3.0-12. I don't see any other announcement of it; is the above
> the only difference in it? Should it still be experimental?
Aargh. bash-3.0-12 depends on snapshots (it won't work with
cygwin-1.5.18). I am waffling between putting out a bash-3.0-13 that
works with cygwin-1.5.18, vs. waiting for cygwin-1.5.19. Meanwhile, I am
also in the middle of trying to build libreadline6-5.1-1, so that I can
then build bash-3.1-1.
OK then, I guess you've convinced me. I will downgrade my cygwin to
1.5.18 long enough to build bash-3.0-13 (hopefully within the next week),
announce it, before focusing on building bash-3.1-1 as the new
experimental version that depends on a snapshot.
- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!
Eric Blake ebb9@byu.net
volunteer cygwin bash maintainer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDoWuD84KuGfSFAYARAoQwAJ9ioQ0d09/2quKkjiYqsZxzXVlQLACeOWci
ZE/1r64rnLBq+sTcuYsudzA=
=uenh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list