Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
Thu Jun 2 15:43:00 GMT 2005
> amusingling enough -- their
> execution times are *slower* than cygwin's... Of
this is a joke right? I found SFU to be at least 2-3
times faster in loading and executing programs in
general. Its too bad their POSIX imple. is less than
half baked and unuseable for building any package
> course MS might have
> deliberately used non-optimized methods for their
> services to convince
> people to recode for the Win32 interface (and thus
> benefit by increased
> Win32 lockin).
this might be famously true.
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin