Serious performance problems (malloc related?)

[Gerrit P. Haase]

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Robb, Sam wrote:
>>Is there any reason why the cygwin DLL couldn't be built
>>twice: once for Win9x, and once for WinNT-based systems?
>>
>>Aside from potential installation issues ("install this
>>version of the DLL under 9x, that version under NT), it
>>seems like this would be a reasonable optimization.

> As long as we're mulling over ideas...

Alternatively, we could drop Win98 support.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/