ri dumps core
Sun Jun 12 09:30:00 GMT 2005
On Jun 11 12:42, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:04:22PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > Steve Kelem wrote:
> > > Okay. I ran rebase. Then I get the same problem.
> > I just noticed that ruby uses .so for the name of its dynamic modules,
> > but I think the rebaseall script only looks for .dll. Make a list of
> > all the .so files in the ruby package and pass that to rebaseall with
> > the -T flag, or modify the rebaseall script to look for files ending
> > in .so. I think this could be a bug in the rebaseall script.
> Do others agree? If so, then I will change rebaseall to look for .so
> files too. Any other extensions besides .so?
I agree and *.so is the only other extension, AFAICS. The next OpenSSL
version will bring them, too.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Red Hat, Inc.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin