ri dumps core

Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Sun Jun 12 09:30:00 GMT 2005

On Jun 11 12:42, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:04:22PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > Steve Kelem wrote:
> > > Okay.  I ran rebase.  Then I get the same problem.
> > 
> > I just noticed that ruby uses .so for the name of its dynamic modules,
> > but I think the rebaseall script only looks for .dll.  Make a list of
> > all the .so files in the ruby package and pass that to rebaseall with
> > the -T flag, or modify the rebaseall script to look for files ending
> > in .so.  I think this could be a bug in the rebaseall script.
> Do others agree?  If so, then I will change rebaseall to look for .so
> files too.  Any other extensions besides .so?

I agree and *.so is the only other extension, AFAICS.  The next OpenSSL
version will bring them, too.


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

More information about the Cygwin mailing list