Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin?

Christopher Faylor
Thu Jun 16 15:09:00 GMT 2005

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 07:50:59AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Andreas Eibach wrote:
>>This is VERY bad.  You can only search for "Apache and 2 and 0 and 54",
>>but not for apache and 2.0.54 (read 2 dot 0 dot 54 _in this order_).
>>Quotes aren't accepted either; I think as the mailing lists archives
>>are that important and used so much, there should at least be an exact
>>match.  No user wants to delve through 500 or 1000 messages with 450 or
>>950 of them irrelevant.  (Rant over.)
>The htdig on is pretty bad.  I always use google to search
>the archives.  You can do this easily with a query of:

Suggestions for improving ht::dig's configuration on are
always welcome over at overseers at sourceware dot org.

> inurl:cygwin inurl:ml <query words here>
>You can even use more "inurl:"s to restrict by year/month since those
>are part of the URL.  In addition, the list is archived at many other
>places, all of which have searches.  Three that come to mind are
>,, and

I'm glad that someone finally suggested this.  I think a few more
messages along these lines would have surely kick started a mean
response from me.

Maybe google wasn't around in B19 days...


Unsubscribe info:
Problem reports:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list