no message or dialog when a DLL is missing

[mwoehlke]

Shankar Unni wrote:
> Pierre Baillargeon wrote:
>> Thanks for the information. I will not submit a patch because I 
>> suspect the current behavior is prefered by the majority: having a 
>> dialog pop-up  in the middle of scripts is much more catastrophic is 
>> most case than having a return code, for unattended processing. So I 
>> expect the patch to be badly received by end users.
> 
> Perhaps the right thing would be for "somebody" to emit an error (read on).
> 
> On Linux, etc., when a shared library is missing at runtime, any attempt 
> to execute a binary depending on it will get an error like:
> 
> % /usr/bin/xvidtime
> /usr/bin/xvidtune: error while loading shared libraries: libXdmcp.so.6: 
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> 
> I'm pretty this message is coming directly from (in this case) 
> ld-linux.so (the "DLL loader" on linux).
> 
> If Cygwin is intercepting the equivalent exception on Windows, perhaps a 
> possible compromise would be for cygwin1.dll to emit such an error to 
> stderr?

That would be my vote as well; failing with return code 128 is far less 
helpful, and printing to "stderr" (or whatever is eating off that pipe) 
is much more script-friendly than a GUI pop-up.

At any rate, I've seen '128's before.

-- 
Matthew
We are Microsoft. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile. --Badtech


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/