'Missing isnand' still not fixed in 2006-03-01 snapshot

[Dave Korn]

On 02 March 2006 14:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> 
> Well, I did this:
> 
>   $ nm libcygwin.a | grep isnan
>   00000000 T ___isnand
>   00000000 I __imp____isnand
>   00000000 T ___isnanf
>   00000000 I __imp____isnanf
>   00000000 I __imp___isnan
>   00000000 T __isnan
>   00000000 I __imp___isnanf
>   00000000 T __isnanf
>   00000000 I __imp__isnan
>   00000000 T _isnan
>   00000000 I __imp__isnanf
>   00000000 T _isnanf
>   $ nm libm.a | grep isnan
>   00000000 T ___isnand
>   00000000 I __imp____isnand
>   00000000 T ___isnanf
>   00000000 I __imp____isnanf
>   00000000 I __imp__isnan
>   00000000 T _isnan
>   00000000 I __imp__isnanf
>   00000000 T _isnanf
> 
> I don't see what would be wrong here.  

  It's not in libc.a, does that make a difference?


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/