Precision of doubles and stdio
skaller
skaller@users.sourceforge.net
Sun Mar 5 13:09:00 GMT 2006
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 12:44 +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> Tim Prince wrote:
> My
> > past reading of various relevant documents convinced me that digits
> > beyond the 17th in formatting of doubles are not required by any
> > standard to be consistent between implementations. They have no useful
> > function, as 17 digits are sufficient to determine uniquely the
> > corresponding binary value in IEEE 754 format.
>
> Thank you Tim. We were unaware of this giant bug in the C standard.
> All the best,
There is no bug in the C Standard. The C standard makes it
clear the accuracy of floating point operations is
implementation defined ,and the implementor may even say the
accuracy is undefined.
This is not a bug, it is the proper thing for a language
standard.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Async PL, Realtime software consultants
Checkout Felix: http://felix.sourceforge.net
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list