ls output still truncated

Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com
Tue Feb 20 20:21:00 GMT 2007


Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2007-02-20, Chuck wrote:
>> Folks I could really use some help here. I still cannot get the ls
>> command to work reliably. It worked for years and about two weeks ago
>> started sputtering.  I have completely unstalled all cygwin packages,
>> deleted the directories, and reinstalled from scratch. Even just
>> installing the bare mimimum packages and running a bash shell without X
>> or even a .profile, ls still fails to output anything 50% of the time.
> 
> At this point, I'd be inclined to get the source for ls, build a 
> version with debugging enabled, and use gdb.  I've never used gdb 
> under Cygwin, so there may be some reason it isn't as useful under 
> Cygwin as it is under, say, Linux.  In that case, you could add a 
> few printfs to see what's happening.
>

There's no great difference between gdb on Cygwin vs Linux.

Doing some debugging locally is by far the best way to gain some insight
as to what's going on.  Good advice.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list