script problem

[Matt Wozniski]

On 3/2/07, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Actually the advantages tend to go the other way at this point.  The Cygwin
> non-X rxvt is no longer being actively maintained upstream.  rxvt-unicode is
> being actively maintained both upstream and here in Cygwinton.  It looks
> nicer (fonts appear to get antialising), there's bugfixes (though I've only
> ever run into one minor bug on the non-X rxvt), and has some Unicode/UTF-8
> support if that's important to you.

And, xterm has extremely good unicode support.  If unicode support is
important to you, then right now xterm provides more support than the
cygwin rxvt-unicode.

~Matt

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/